Understanding the Mariner Middle IB Middle Years Programme Report Card
Does this report card replace the Lee County report card/Why is there a separate MYP report card?
Mariner Middle is an International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme (MYP) World School. The IB MYP philosophy emphasizes providing meaningful communication and reflection on development. The MYP report card is meant to serve as an opportunity for students and families to reflect on the progression of learning over the course of the year. The MYP report card does not replace the Lee County report card.
How were these criteria selected?
All MYP schools around the world are required to use the MYP criteria as established by the International Baccalaureate. Each subject area has four criteria. These criteria are skill-based and progress across all three years of the MYP at Mariner Middle. The scores come from the students’ most recent or compelling work on summative assessment tasks for each criterion. Teachers provide these rubrics to students prior to the assessment task so they know how they will be scored.
Are the criteria the same in all classes?
While some subject areas have overlapping criteria, all subject areas use different descriptions for those criteria. For example, in a Civics class, Criteria A: Knowing and Understanding, means a student should be able to use a range of terminology in context. However, in a math class, Criteria A: Knowing and Understanding, means a student should solve problems correctly in a variety of contexts.
The chart below provides all of the criteria for each subject area (the chart is best viewed in landscape on a mobile device).
|
Criteria
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
Arts
|
Knowing and Understanding
|
Developing Skills
|
Thinking Creatively
|
Responding
|
Design
|
Inquiring and Analyzing
|
Developing Ideas
|
Creating the Solution
|
Evaluating
|
Individuals and Societies
|
Knowing and Understanding
|
Investigating
|
Communicating
|
Thinking Critically
|
Language Acquisition
|
Comprehending Spoken and Visual Text
|
Comprehending Written and Visual Text
|
Communicating
|
Using Language
|
Language and Literature
|
Analyzing
|
Organizing
|
Producing Text
|
Using Language
|
Mathematics
|
Knowing and Understanding
|
Investigating Patterns
|
Communicating
|
Applying Mathematics in Real World Contexts
|
Physical and Health Education
|
Knowing and Understanding
|
Planning for Performance
|
Applying and Performing
|
Reflecting and Improving Performance
|
Sciences
|
Knowing and Understanding
|
Inquiring and Designing
|
Processing and Evaluating
|
Reflecting on the Impacts of Science
|
Community Project
|
Investigating |
Planning |
Taking Action |
Reflecting |
What do the criteria numbers mean?
The criteria numbers are associated with rubrics teachers provide students during units of study. You can see on our website under “Subject Area Overviews” which criteria were used for which units. Generally speaking, scores in the mark band 1-2 show limited performance, 3-4 adequate performance, 5-6 substantial performance, and 7-8 consistently excellent performance.
The criteria scores should not be converted to a standard percentage as they are descriptions of sophistication and not point values. For example, a criteria score of 4 demonstrates adequate and satisfactory performance, but 4/8 = 50%. A 50% would not match a description of adequate and satisfactory work.
What does the overall score number mean?
The overall score is all four criteria added together. The overall score is a boundary score and indicates what your student’s MYP grade is for the year. Again, these are not point values and should not be averaged. Below are the boundaries as well as descriptions for each MYP score.
Mariner Middle MYP general grade descriptors
Grade
|
Boundary (overall score)
|
Descriptor
|
1
|
1-5
|
Produces work of very limited quality. Conveys many significant misunderstandings or lacks understanding of most concepts and contexts. Very rarely demonstrates critical or creative thinking. Very inflexible, rarely using knowledge or skills.
|
2
|
6-9
|
Produces work of limited quality. Expresses misunderstandings or significant gaps in understanding for many concepts and contexts. Infrequently demonstrates critical or creative thinking. Generally inflexible in the use of knowledge and skills, infrequently applying knowledge and skills.
|
3
|
10-14
|
Produces work of an acceptable quality. Communicates basic understanding of many concepts and contexts, with occasionally significant misunderstandings or gaps. Begins to demonstrate some basic critical and creative thinking. Is often inflexible in the use of knowledge and skills, requiring support even in familiar classroom.
|
4
|
15-18
|
Produces good-quality work. Communicates basic understanding of most concepts and contexts with few misunderstandings and minor gaps. Often demonstrates basic critical and creative thinking. Uses knowledge and skills with some flexibility in familiar classroom situations, but requires support in unfamiliar situations.
|
5
|
19-23
|
Produces generally high-quality work. Communicates secure understanding of concepts and contexts. Demonstrates critical and creative thinking, sometimes with sophistication. Uses knowledge and skills in familiar classroom and real-world situations and, with support, some unfamiliar real-world situations.
|
6
|
24-27
|
Produces high-quality, occasionally innovative work. Communicates extensive understanding of concepts and contexts. Demonstrates critical and creative thinking, frequently with sophistication. Uses knowledge and skills in familiar and unfamiliar classroom and real-world situations, often with independence.
|
7
|
28-32
|
Produces high-quality, frequently innovative work. Communicates
comprehensive, nuanced understanding of concepts and contexts. Consistently demonstrates sophisticated critical and creative thinking. Frequently transfers knowledge and skills with independence and expertise in a variety of complex classroom and real-world situations.
|